I hold four laboratory reports on the products in this shop. Between them they cover one retatrutide line, one tirzepatide line, one CJC and Ipamorelin sample, and one anonymous blend. They do not cover everything I sell, they are not per-vial tests, and none of them was issued to me. I am publishing the figures, the dates and the gaps because you cannot judge a certificate you are not allowed to read.
The four reports, as recorded
Figures below are transcribed from the original documents we hold. Task numbers are the laboratory's own.
| Product line | Laboratory task | Analysis date | Recorded result | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retatrutide 10mg line | #203223 | 10 JUL 2026 | Retatrutide 11.53 mg; 11.53 mg purity 99.240%; 99.498% | A reference report exists for this product line |
| Tirzepatide 60mg line | #78893 | 17 SEP 2025 | Tirzepatide 64.78 mg; 65.54 mg purity 99.923%; 99.835% | A 2025 reference report exists; no current-lot report |
| CJC-1295 (No DAC) + Ipamorelin | #168117 | 01 JUN 2026 | Ipamorelin 5.61 mg (no purity figure on the report); CJC-1295 (mod GRF 1-29) 5.12 mg (no purity figure on the report) | Content verified only; no purity figure, so no purity claim can rest on it |
| TB-500 / BPC-157 / GHK-Cu / KPV blend | #167288 | 09 JUN 2026 | KPV 11.45 mg; 11.51 mg (no purity figure on the report); TB-500 (TB4) 12.30 mg; 12.34 mg (no purity figure on the report); BPC-157 10.09 mg; 10.11 mg (no purity figure on the report); GHK-Cu (GHK content) [Copper content] 45.10 mg (40.03 mg) [5.07 mg]; 45.47 mg (40.17 mg) [5.30 mg] (no purity figure on the report) | Anonymous sample, no manufacturer or batch declared; content only |
What these reports do prove
Each one describes a sample that a third party submitted to an independent laboratory: the identity of the material found, the quantity present in that sample, and where stated, the purity figure. Those are real, checkable facts about a specific sample on a specific date.
What they do not prove
- They are not per-vial tests. One tested sample does not certify a production run, and no report here verifies every vial we ship.
- They are not about activity, sterility or safety. A purity percentage is a composition figure, not a statement about what a compound does or whether it is safe.
- They are not current-lot documents. A report describes the sample that was submitted on the date shown. Ask for lot-matched documentation if your work requires it, and accept "we do not have it" as an answer.
- Two of them carry no purity figure at all. The CJC and blend reports verify identity and content only, so nothing on this site should be read as a purity claim for those products.
- One is an anonymous blend. It cannot be evidence for a separately supplied single-compound vial, including our own TB-500, BPC-157 and GHK-Cu vials.
Where each of our products stands
- Retatrutide 10mg: reference report held, purity stated.
- Tirzepatide 60mg: a 2025 reference report with purity stated; there is no report demonstrating the current lot.
- Retatrutide 15mg: no matching report for this strength. A 10mg report is not evidence for a 15mg vial.
- GHK-Cu 50mg and 100mg, standalone TB-500, standalone BPC-157, both bundles: no matching report published. The blend report does not substitute for any of them.
- Bacteriostatic water 2ml: no water-specific analytical or sterility report is published.
- CJC-1295 (No DAC) + Ipamorelin: content-only reference report, currently out of stock.
How to check any report yourself, including ours
Match the compound and the strength, read the analysis date, tie the document to a lot code where one exists, and verify through the laboratory's own lookup rather than a seller's copy. We explain the whole method in how to check a peptide lab report. We deliberately withhold the laboratory verification keys: they resolve to reports produced for other clients, and publishing them would expose those clients' records.
How we verify these figures
The figures on this page are transcribed from the original documents we hold and set out as text, so that the numbers and their limits can be read and checked without depending on a picture of a document. If you are a laboratory, a journalist or a researcher and you want to check our working, ask us and we will walk you through the documents we hold.
Why publish this at all
Because the alternative is the industry norm: a purity headline, an unreadable screenshot, and no statement of what the document does not cover. If this page is useful to you, use it, cite it, or tell us where the reasoning is wrong.
For laboratory research use only. Not for human or veterinary use, and not a licensed medicine.